Not-So-Super.
Debbie Morrison • November 2, 2020

Not-So-Super.


Why super non-compliance is a serious issue for Australian employers.

Compulsory employer superannuation contributions are nothing new. They were actually introduced by the Keating Government way back in 1992, yet many employers continue to fall short of their super obligations each year, often unknowingly. Could you be one of them?


The Federal Government has been concerned about the impact of super non-compliance for some time, with the ATO estimating the shortfall between what employers should be paying their employees in super and what is actually paid, currently runs well into the billions of dollars each year. It’s a position backed up by separate research conducted by Industry Super Australia.


The super spotlight intensifies

The size of Australia’s ‘super shortfall’ came into sharp focus following the release of an often-damning 2017 report into Superannuation Guarantee Non-compliance, prepared for the Minister for Revenue and Financial Services. Coupled with several high-profile cases of employees being underpaid in the media – including businesses owned by Masterchef host, George Calombaris, the (now defunct) food delivery operator Foodora and retail cosmetics chain Lush which admitted to $2 million of underpayments affecting more than 5,000 of its staff – there onus has never been stronger on employers to get it right.


Increased policing and penalties

The ATO has been quite vocal of its intent to step up policing of employers to ensure proper super compliance, while employees are also increasingly raising their concerns directly with the Fair Work Ombudsman, with more and more cases ending up in court. Penalties for non-compliance can be severe too, including heavy fines and even 12-month jail terms for directors found guilty of breaches. This means it’s essential to understand – and meet – your employer super obligations. As the saying goes, ignorance is no excuse.


Employer amnesty?

Whilst it’s yet to pass through the Senate, it’s worth noting moves are currently afoot in Canberra to provide a 12-month Superannuation Guarantee Amnesty. This would provide a one-off opportunity for Australian employers to correct any past super guarantee shortfalls without penalty. As an added incentive, catch-up payments made during the amnesty period will also be tax deductible. You can find out more on the ATO website.


How to correct an underpayment

Underpayments can happen for all manner of reasons. But regardless of why, if any of your employees haven’t received their correct super entitlements, it’s in your best interests to rectify the situation as soon as possible. To help you do this, the Fair Work Ombudsman provides a step-by-step guide on how to do it here.


    __________________________________________________________________


Some key things to remember

 

  • Compulsory employer contributions are currently 9.5% of employee earnings
  • Employers are legally required to pay superannuation to every employee over the age of 18 earning more than $450 gross a month
  • Superannuation is required to be paid within 28 days of the end of each quarter
  • It doesn’t matter if an employee works casual, part-time or full-time hours – they’re still entitled to super
  • Contractors may also be eligible for super, so be sure to check
  • Small businesses account for around 70% of reported superannuation guarantee non-compliance with cash flow problems often cited as the major reason.

 


    __________________________________________________________________

 


 

A woman is holding two bottles of cosmetics in her hands.
By John Elliott April 21, 2025
Australia’s health, wellness, and supplements sector isn’t just growing. It’s exploding. From functional drinks to adaptogenic gummies, wellness brands have gone from niche to mainstream in record time. The industry is now worth over $5.6 billion, up from $4.7 billion in 2020 — a 19% growth in just three years. IBISWorld projects continued expansion with a CAGR of 5.3% through 2028. But behind the glossy packaging and influencer campaigns, something else is happening: the regulators have arrived. And most wellness brands? They’re underprepared. From Trend to Target The boom brought founders, fitness coaches, nutritionists, and marketing entrepreneurs into the supplement space. What many built was impressive. But what most forgot was how fast wellness moves from enthusiasm to enforcement. With more than 40 infringement notices and administrative sanctions in Q1 alone, the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) strengthened enforcement of the Therapeutic Goods Advertising Code in early 2024. Prominent companies were named in public. Soon after, the ACCC revised its guidelines for influencer marketing disclosures and launched a campaign against the use of pseudoscientific terminology in product marketing. TGA head Professor Anthony Lawler noted in March 2024: “We’re seeing an unacceptably high level of non-compliance, particularly around unsubstantiated therapeutic claims.” In short: credibility is the new battleground. Why Sales-First Leadership is Failing Too many brands are still led by executives whose playbooks were built on community engagement, retail hustle, and Instagram fluency. That got them early traction. But it won’t keep them compliant — or protect them from an investor exodus when the lawsuits begin. The biggest risks now are not formulation errors. They’re: Claims breaches Compliance negligence Advertising missteps Unqualified health endorsements Reputational collapse through regulatory exposure And these aren’t theoretical. The TGA pulled 197 listed medicines from the market in 2023 alone — a 42% increase on the previous year — due to non-compliant claims or sponsor breaches. What the Next Wellness Leader Looks Like This is where many boards and founders face a difficult transition. The next generation of leadership in wellness isn’t defined by hustle. It’s defined by: Deep regulatory fluency Cross-functional commercial leadership (eComm, retail, pharma, FMCG) Reputation management under pressure Ability to scale with scrutiny, not just speed The leadership profiles now needed aren’t coming out of marketing agencies — they’re coming out of pharmaceuticals, healthtech, and functional food. They’ve sat on regulatory committees. They’ve built compliance-first commercial strategies. They understand how to win trust, not just impressions. Yes, this might feel like a shift away from the founder-led energy that made these brands exciting. But it’s not about slowing down. It’s about making sure you’re still standing when the music stops. Where the Gaps Are The underlying problem isn’t just non-compliance. It's immaturity in structural leadership. The majority of wellness brands haven't developed: An accountable governance structure; a scalable compliance architecture; a risk-aware marketing culture; and any significant succession planning beyond the founder. In fact, a 2023 survey by Complementary Medicines Australia found that only 22% of wellness businesses had dedicated compliance leadership at executive level, and just 14% had formal succession plans in place. This isn’t sustainable — not at scale, and certainly not under scrutiny. Final Thought The wellness boom isn’t over. But the rules have changed. Rapid growth is no longer enough. The brands that win from here will be those with: A compliance culture baked in Leadership teams built for complexity A board that sees regulation not as a barrier, but a brand advantage Those who don’t? They could be one audit away from crisis.
A Farmer walking through a barn, using a laptop with cows eating hay nearby.
By John Elliott April 17, 2025
Australia’s meat sector is facing a leadership vacuum. Explore the hidden crisis behind staffing, succession, and ESG risk in food manufacturing.