Addressing The Hidden Biases in Executive Hiring
John Elliott • Oct 24, 2023

In the corridors of corporate power, the recruitment and selection of executives has traditionally been a carefully curated process. While this careful approach is commendable, many executive teams and boardrooms still lack the rich tapestry of gender, racial, and cultural diversities that their companies profess, potentially jeopardising the richness of diversity and the competitive advantage it brings to leadership teams.


For decades, businesses have hailed the importance of diversity, and the values of equal representation and inclusivity. While overt discrimination might no longer be as rampant, the subtle nemesis of unconscious bias still plays a pivotal role. As we unravel the fabric of executive hiring processes, we discover hidden biases which can significantly impact business growth, performance, and the cultivation of a diverse leadership team.


Unconscious Bias in Executive Hiring: What It Is and Its Implications

At its core, unconscious bias refers to the preferences and prejudices we hold without awareness. It's an inherent human trait, driven by our brain's need to categorise and make quick judgments based on past experiences. 


What’s alarming is that such biases, more often than not, aren’t the result of conscious discrimination. They stem from deep-seated stereotypes or societal norms that we've absorbed over time. When left unchecked and translated to hiring, these biases can have detrimental effects, leading to a homogenous leadership team, which in turn has implications for business growth and performance.


A study by Harvard Business Review highlighted that despite equal qualifications, a candidate's gender, name, or even hobbies can influence hiring decisions. 1 When biases creep into executive hiring, they limit the talent pool, skewing it towards candidates that 'look' or 'feel' right, rather than those who are objectively the best for the job.


From a business perspective, this is concerning. McKinsey's landmark study found that companies with more diverse executive teams are 25% more likely to outperform their peers on profitability. When companies overlook diverse candidates due to hidden biases, they're not just bypassing talent—they're missing out on potential profits and innovative ideas.


How Boards Can Identify and Address Bias

Self-Awareness and Training: The first step to combating unconscious bias is recognizing its existence. Boards must commit to regular training that highlights the different forms of bias, from affinity bias (preferring those similar to ourselves) to confirmation bias (focusing on information that confirms our existing beliefs).


Diverse Hiring Panels: Having a diverse group of individuals involved in the hiring process can help counteract individual biases. The broader the range of perspectives, the less likely a single biassed view will dominate.


Standardised Interview Processes: Instead of free-form interviews, boards can employ a standardised set of questions and evaluation metrics. This reduces the influence of a candidate's background or extraneous details.


Anonymous Application Processes: Some companies have started using processes where names, genders, and other potentially bias-triggering information are removed from applications.


Preventing Bias: Proactive Measures

While identifying biases is crucial, prevention is better than cure. Boards can employ the following strategies:


Diversify the Decision-making Team: Ensuring that the team responsible for executive hires is diverse can help bring in multiple perspectives and reduce the impact of individual biases.


Standardise Interviews: By asking every candidate the same set of questions in the same order, boards can ensure comparability and reduce the impact of biases on the decision-making process.


Use Data-driven Metrics: Instead of relying on gut feelings or intuition, boards can emphasise the use of data-driven metrics to assess a candidate's potential and fit.


The Role of Executive Search Firms in Limiting Bias

While internal measures are essential, sometimes, the inherent biases are so deep-seated that an external perspective becomes invaluable. Executive search firms have the expertise and frameworks to source and evaluate candidates objectively. Partnering with a renowned executive search firm can help in the following ways:


Expertise and Objectivity: These firms bring a level of expertise and objectivity to the hiring process, ensuring that the best candidates are shortlisted based solely on merit.

Wide-ranging Networks: They have extensive networks, allowing for a more diverse pool of candidates than a company might be able to source independently.


Bias-free Technologies: Many top-tier search firms employ advanced AI technologies that help in unbiased candidate sourcing and assessment.


A study from Harvard Business Review underscored the value of search firms, noting that companies that used such firms had leadership teams that were 30% more diverse than those who relied solely on internal recruitment processes.


The Urgency of Addressing Bias

The evidence is irrefutable. Addressing and eliminating bias in executive hiring isn’t just an ethical issue—it's a business concern. By limiting the pool from which leaders are drawn, companies can unintentionally stifle innovation, reduce market understanding, and even decrease financial returns.


For boards, the onus lies in not just recognising and preventing biases but in proactively seeking diverse leadership. Boards and executive teams must be introspective, willing to challenge their beliefs and processes. By doing so, they're not just promoting fairness but ensuring that their companies remain at the forefront of global business. So, the next time you sit in that boardroom, remember: diversity isn’t just a checkbox. It's a competitive advantage. 


Executive introducing new leader as part of executive onboarding process

Executive Onboarding in Food & Beverage: The Blueprint for Success

By John Elliott • 09 Apr, 2024
The arrival of a new executive heralds a period of opportunity, transformation, and, inevitably, challenge. The process of integrating this new leader – onboarding – is a critical, often under-emphasised phase that can significantly influence the trajectory of both the individual's and the company's future. So why do so many organisations fail to get executive onboarding right? The High Stakes of Executive Onboarding The adage "well begun is half done" resonates profoundly in executive onboarding. Harvard Business Review reveals a startling statistic: as many as 40-50% of new executives fail within the first 18 months of their appointment. This failure rate is not just a personal setback for the executives; it represents a substantial cost to the company – often up to five times the executive's salary. The reasons for failure? Poor cultural fit, unclear expectations, and inadequate onboarding support top the list. But what makes the consumer goods industry particularly challenging for new executives? It's a dynamic sector where consumer preferences shift rapidly, supply chains are complex, and competition is intense. Here, more than anywhere else, an executive's ability to adapt and lead effectively from the outset is paramount. The Multifaceted Challenges in Onboarding The failure of many organisations in the consumer goods industry to effectively onboard new executives is multifaceted: 1. Tailored Onboarding Versus Standard Processes The provided text emphasises the necessity of a tailored onboarding process for executives, distinct from standard employee onboarding. This is particularly relevant in the consumer goods industry, where executives must navigate unique market dynamics, consumer trends, and complex supply chains in Australia. Tailoring the onboarding process to address these specific industry challenges ensures that executives can hit the ground running with a clear understanding of the landscape they will operate in. 2. The Role of a Dedicated Onboarding Team The concept of a dedicated project team for executive onboarding, as implemented by Palo Alto Networks, could be highly effective in the consumer goods sector. Such a team could focus on providing industry-specific insights, facilitating connections with key stakeholders, and ensuring that new executives understand the nuances of the Australian consumer market. This team would act as a bridge between the executive and the unique aspects of the Australian consumer goods landscape. 3. Engagement During the Notice Period In the consumer goods industry, where market trends and consumer preferences can shift rapidly, keeping executives engaged during their notice period is crucial. This period can be used to familiarise them with current market analyses, consumer behaviour trends, and ongoing projects. This proactive approach ensures that the executive is well-informed and ready to contribute from day one. 4. Cultural Orientation and Familiarity Building a strong cultural connection is vital in any industry but takes on added importance in consumer goods, which often relies on understanding and adapting to cultural nuances to succeed. Regular touchpoints that orient the new executive to the company's culture, values, and consumer-centric approach can help in crafting strategies that resonate with the Australian market. 5. Collaboration Among Various Teams The need for collaboration between HR, Reward, Performance, and Talent teams is pertinent in the consumer goods sector. This collaboration can ensure a unified approach to addressing the specific challenges and opportunities an executive might face in this dynamic industry. For instance, understanding the compensation frameworks and performance indicators specific to different departments within a consumer goods company can aid an executive in making more informed decisions. 6. 'Just-in-Time' Resources The idea of providing ‘just-in-time’ resources is particularly beneficial for executives in the fast-moving consumer goods sector. Given the rapid pace of change in consumer preferences and market trends, having access to real-time data and concise, relevant information can be invaluable. This approach allows executives to stay agile and make decisions based on the latest market insights. 7. Understanding of Performance Cycles In the consumer goods industry, understanding the timing and nuances of performance cycles is critical. This is especially true in a market like Australia, where seasonal trends and events can significantly impact consumer behaviour. The onboarding process should include education on these cycles, preparing executives to plan and execute strategies effectively in sync with these fluctuations. The Role of the Board in Facilitating Successful Onboarding The board of directors plays a pivotal role in the onboarding process. Their actions, or lack thereof, can set the tone for the new executive’s tenure. What should they be doing? Pre-Onboarding Engagement: The process starts before the executive's first day. Boards must ensure clear communication about the company's vision, challenges, and expectations. This early dialogue helps align the executive’s mindset with the company's strategic goals. Structured Onboarding Plan: Developing a comprehensive, customised onboarding plan is crucial. This should cover not just the operational aspects of the role but also the cultural and interpersonal dynamics of the organisation. Mentorship and Networking Support: Assigning a mentor from the board or senior leadership can accelerate the integration process. Additionally, facilitating introductions and networking opportunities within and outside the company is invaluable. Regular Check-Ins and Feedback: Ongoing support doesn’t end after the first week or month. Regular check-ins to provide and receive feedback ensure any issues are addressed promptly. Performance Metrics: Clear, early-established metrics for success help the new executive understand how their performance will be measured. Enhancing Executive Performance through Effective Onboarding The correlation between effective onboarding and enhanced executive performance is well-established. A study by McKinsey found that executives who had a successful onboarding experience were 1.9 times more likely to exceed performance expectations. Furthermore, these executives reported feeling more integrated into the company culture and more effective in their roles earlier than their peers who experienced less structured onboarding. Effective onboarding leads to better decision-making, faster strategy implementation, and a more cohesive leadership team. It builds a foundation of trust and understanding that is crucial in the high-stake, rapidly evolving consumer goods market. Onboarding as a Strategic Imperative Effective executive onboarding goes beyond mere orientation – it is a strategic process that lays the groundwork for long-term success. As we've seen in the consumer goods industry in Australia, a well-planned and executed onboarding process can be the difference between a flourishing leadership tenure and a costly misstep. In an era where the cost of failure is high and the speed of change is relentless, consumer goods companies must view executive onboarding not as a perfunctory checklist but as a fundamental building block of sustainable leadership and organisational success. Remember, your new executive's journey is a reflection of your organisation's commitment to leadership excellence. Invest in their onboarding, and you're investing in the future of your company.
two men are sitting at a table with a laptop and talking to each other .

Talent Acquisition: Internal Strategies vs. Executive Search Partnerships in Australia's Beverage Industry

By John Elliott • 18 Mar, 2024
Explore the pivotal choice between internal talent acquisition and hiring via executive search firms in the food and beverage industry for optimal growth.
Share by: