Is IP walking out your door?
Debbie Morrison • April 6, 2020

Is IP walking out your door?



 

Have you ever considered how much it costs to lose a key team member? Some studies show it can be anything up to 200% of the person’s annual salary. At ELR Executive we actually think that seems rather low, especially if you factor in the associated ‘IP Drain’ – that is, the cost of the knowledge that walks out your door the day they leave. From our experience across many industries this cost is very real. It can be felt for months if not years into the future and manifest itself in many ways.

 

Of course no amount of planning can guarantee key people will never leave. But you can certainly take steps to greatly mitigate the damage in such situations. The vital thing is to do it now – before the horse (okay, team member) has bolted.

 

Irreplaceable? No such thing.

It may not seem like it at the time, especially if the departure is sudden. But it’s worth remembering no-one is irreplaceable. Or, to put it more accurately, no one should be irreplaceable. Sure, they may have years of experience and knowledge, they may play a central role in critical client relationships, they may posses an outstanding work ethic and be hugely popular within your team. But while initially stressful, their departure may ultimately provide an opportunity to make some exciting changes and improvements in your business.

 

Are you Reactive or Proactive?

Reactive businesses generally assume they must immediately find a replacement when a key person leaves. This is frequently true, but only due to them having a lack of other alternatives. It’s also fraught with risk as it’s often a rushed process.

Regardless of how good they are, it can take many months for a new employee to ‘bed in’ and reach their full productivity, which again caries a cost to the business.

 

Proactive businesses, on the other hand, have already considered the impact of key departures – long before they actually happen. Rather than make knee-jerk decisions, this foresight allows them to calmly implement a relevant succession plan for that employee and/or department. Perhaps responsibilities can be shifted or divided? Maybe someone (already identified) can be promoted from within, with a less expensive employee hired to replace them instead? There are usually many options; the important thing is to have considered them well beforehand.

 

What does succession planning involve?

Organisations who do it best are typically those with robust internal processes for talent identification and development, especially in core departments and positions. They also make information sharing a real priority to help spread the reservoir of knowledge throughout the business and, as a result, minimise the effects of IP Drain. Sure, this all takes time and effort, but the rewards can be significant. As and when key employees depart, or perhaps the business experiences a surge in growth, they more often than not have very capable employees ready to step up and fill the breach.

 

Just a final thing to bear in mind. If your succession plans involve changing the job description or responsibilities of another team member, be aware of what might constitute a ‘redundancy’ or ‘termination’. Seek expert legal advice if you’re in any doubt.

 

 

 

 

 


A woman is holding two bottles of cosmetics in her hands.
By John Elliott April 21, 2025
Australia’s health, wellness, and supplements sector isn’t just growing. It’s exploding. From functional drinks to adaptogenic gummies, wellness brands have gone from niche to mainstream in record time. The industry is now worth over $5.6 billion, up from $4.7 billion in 2020 — a 19% growth in just three years. IBISWorld projects continued expansion with a CAGR of 5.3% through 2028. But behind the glossy packaging and influencer campaigns, something else is happening: the regulators have arrived. And most wellness brands? They’re underprepared. From Trend to Target The boom brought founders, fitness coaches, nutritionists, and marketing entrepreneurs into the supplement space. What many built was impressive. But what most forgot was how fast wellness moves from enthusiasm to enforcement. With more than 40 infringement notices and administrative sanctions in Q1 alone, the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) strengthened enforcement of the Therapeutic Goods Advertising Code in early 2024. Prominent companies were named in public. Soon after, the ACCC revised its guidelines for influencer marketing disclosures and launched a campaign against the use of pseudoscientific terminology in product marketing. TGA head Professor Anthony Lawler noted in March 2024: “We’re seeing an unacceptably high level of non-compliance, particularly around unsubstantiated therapeutic claims.” In short: credibility is the new battleground. Why Sales-First Leadership is Failing Too many brands are still led by executives whose playbooks were built on community engagement, retail hustle, and Instagram fluency. That got them early traction. But it won’t keep them compliant — or protect them from an investor exodus when the lawsuits begin. The biggest risks now are not formulation errors. They’re: Claims breaches Compliance negligence Advertising missteps Unqualified health endorsements Reputational collapse through regulatory exposure And these aren’t theoretical. The TGA pulled 197 listed medicines from the market in 2023 alone — a 42% increase on the previous year — due to non-compliant claims or sponsor breaches. What the Next Wellness Leader Looks Like This is where many boards and founders face a difficult transition. The next generation of leadership in wellness isn’t defined by hustle. It’s defined by: Deep regulatory fluency Cross-functional commercial leadership (eComm, retail, pharma, FMCG) Reputation management under pressure Ability to scale with scrutiny, not just speed The leadership profiles now needed aren’t coming out of marketing agencies — they’re coming out of pharmaceuticals, healthtech, and functional food. They’ve sat on regulatory committees. They’ve built compliance-first commercial strategies. They understand how to win trust, not just impressions. Yes, this might feel like a shift away from the founder-led energy that made these brands exciting. But it’s not about slowing down. It’s about making sure you’re still standing when the music stops. Where the Gaps Are The underlying problem isn’t just non-compliance. It's immaturity in structural leadership. The majority of wellness brands haven't developed: An accountable governance structure; a scalable compliance architecture; a risk-aware marketing culture; and any significant succession planning beyond the founder. In fact, a 2023 survey by Complementary Medicines Australia found that only 22% of wellness businesses had dedicated compliance leadership at executive level, and just 14% had formal succession plans in place. This isn’t sustainable — not at scale, and certainly not under scrutiny. Final Thought The wellness boom isn’t over. But the rules have changed. Rapid growth is no longer enough. The brands that win from here will be those with: A compliance culture baked in Leadership teams built for complexity A board that sees regulation not as a barrier, but a brand advantage Those who don’t? They could be one audit away from crisis.
A Farmer walking through a barn, using a laptop with cows eating hay nearby.
By John Elliott April 17, 2025
Australia’s meat sector is facing a leadership vacuum. Explore the hidden crisis behind staffing, succession, and ESG risk in food manufacturing.