Carrot or Stick: Which management style is right for your workplace
John Elliott • Nov 18, 2020

Carrot or Stick: Which management style is right for your workplace


The western world has been drifting generally towards the left for some decades. In such an environment you might imagine the argument about carrot or stick management styles would be something of a no contest. Yet closer inspection across a range of businesses, workplaces and industries suggests otherwise. Whether you’re naturally inclined to manage by fear or by reward, many good HR judges believe too much of either can be a bad thing for business, with success often resting in how well you’re able to balance the two to suit the specific make-up of your workforce.


The Carrot

There’s no question positive reinforcement can be a powerful talent management tool; give your team something to really aspire towards and watch them go for it! Of course, while the theory makes considerable sense, it’s important to understand this ‘good cop’ approach doesn’t always work out, and it certainly comes with a unique set of pitfalls and limitations.


One of the biggest problems managers come up against, typically stems from situations where the reward mechanisms – be they related to money, promotion or other workplace or lifestyle incentives – are considered unclear, unfair or unattainable, thus undermining the very behaviours they were intended to inspire. Instead of being motivated, employees can quickly become the exact opposite – demotivated and disgruntled at a perception of hollow promises from management. What does this mean? Simply that for any form of reward-based employee incentive to be successful, the onus is on managers to ensure crystal clear clarity, genuine transparency and perceived fairness for all of those involved.


Ironically, some organisations find themselves suffering from the exact opposite problem. In situations where the carrots are felt to be easily attainable, there’s evidence it can a lead to complacency within the organisation or, worse, a sense of entitlement. Both situations can be counterproductive, so it’s important for your HR incentives to be generous enough – but not too generous. It’s a fine line.


The Stick

Virtually everyone has experienced a ‘bad cop’ or two during their careers, that person whose style is to manage through fear and the ever-present threat, be it spoken or implied, of repercussion. While certainly there’s little question fear and punishment can be powerful motivators, it’s a management style fraught with many dangers – especially in the modern era defined by high rates of employee mobility (not to mention legal action against employers). Hit someone with the metaphorical stick too many times, or without a genuine reason, and they’ll probably just leave you for a competitor. This isn't to suggest employees should be free of consequences for unacceptable behaviour or performance. Rather, it’s an approach that needs to be managed very carefully, or you may end up with an even bigger HR problem on your hands.


Generally speaking, the stick approach is best applied as a short-term team management tool to drive realistic stretch targets or changes in behaviour. It’s also worth remembering that if it’s being used as a punishment for undesirable or unacceptable workplace behaviours, the stick is almost always most effective when used at the time the behaviour has actually occurred. Act too late and the benefits may be negligible, if anything.


So, where does this leave us? Like most things in life, there’s a place for both the carrot and the stick in a modern workplace management strategy. In different situations both are proven to be effective in driving positive results and/or changes. Their application is an ongoing balancing act that some managers and HR departments are far more adept at than others. The good news is with a little focus and awareness of the issues at play, virtually all managers can improve the way they use them.


(If you’re interested in learning more about the psychology behind carrot and stick management styles, there’s a great feature about the work of Douglas McGregor, a social psychologist and professor at MIT in the USA. Read it here ).



Executive introducing new leader as part of executive onboarding process
By John Elliott 09 Apr, 2024
The arrival of a new executive heralds a period of opportunity, transformation, and, inevitably, challenge. The process of integrating this new leader – onboarding – is a critical, often under-emphasised phase that can significantly influence the trajectory of both the individual's and the company's future. So why do so many organisations fail to get executive onboarding right? The High Stakes of Executive Onboarding The adage "well begun is half done" resonates profoundly in executive onboarding. Harvard Business Review reveals a startling statistic: as many as 40-50% of new executives fail within the first 18 months of their appointment. This failure rate is not just a personal setback for the executives; it represents a substantial cost to the company – often up to five times the executive's salary. The reasons for failure? Poor cultural fit, unclear expectations, and inadequate onboarding support top the list. But what makes the consumer goods industry particularly challenging for new executives? It's a dynamic sector where consumer preferences shift rapidly, supply chains are complex, and competition is intense. Here, more than anywhere else, an executive's ability to adapt and lead effectively from the outset is paramount. The Multifaceted Challenges in Onboarding The failure of many organisations in the consumer goods industry to effectively onboard new executives is multifaceted: 1. Tailored Onboarding Versus Standard Processes The provided text emphasises the necessity of a tailored onboarding process for executives, distinct from standard employee onboarding. This is particularly relevant in the consumer goods industry, where executives must navigate unique market dynamics, consumer trends, and complex supply chains in Australia. Tailoring the onboarding process to address these specific industry challenges ensures that executives can hit the ground running with a clear understanding of the landscape they will operate in. 2. The Role of a Dedicated Onboarding Team The concept of a dedicated project team for executive onboarding, as implemented by Palo Alto Networks, could be highly effective in the consumer goods sector. Such a team could focus on providing industry-specific insights, facilitating connections with key stakeholders, and ensuring that new executives understand the nuances of the Australian consumer market. This team would act as a bridge between the executive and the unique aspects of the Australian consumer goods landscape. 3. Engagement During the Notice Period In the consumer goods industry, where market trends and consumer preferences can shift rapidly, keeping executives engaged during their notice period is crucial. This period can be used to familiarise them with current market analyses, consumer behaviour trends, and ongoing projects. This proactive approach ensures that the executive is well-informed and ready to contribute from day one. 4. Cultural Orientation and Familiarity Building a strong cultural connection is vital in any industry but takes on added importance in consumer goods, which often relies on understanding and adapting to cultural nuances to succeed. Regular touchpoints that orient the new executive to the company's culture, values, and consumer-centric approach can help in crafting strategies that resonate with the Australian market. 5. Collaboration Among Various Teams The need for collaboration between HR, Reward, Performance, and Talent teams is pertinent in the consumer goods sector. This collaboration can ensure a unified approach to addressing the specific challenges and opportunities an executive might face in this dynamic industry. For instance, understanding the compensation frameworks and performance indicators specific to different departments within a consumer goods company can aid an executive in making more informed decisions. 6. 'Just-in-Time' Resources The idea of providing ‘just-in-time’ resources is particularly beneficial for executives in the fast-moving consumer goods sector. Given the rapid pace of change in consumer preferences and market trends, having access to real-time data and concise, relevant information can be invaluable. This approach allows executives to stay agile and make decisions based on the latest market insights. 7. Understanding of Performance Cycles In the consumer goods industry, understanding the timing and nuances of performance cycles is critical. This is especially true in a market like Australia, where seasonal trends and events can significantly impact consumer behaviour. The onboarding process should include education on these cycles, preparing executives to plan and execute strategies effectively in sync with these fluctuations. The Role of the Board in Facilitating Successful Onboarding The board of directors plays a pivotal role in the onboarding process. Their actions, or lack thereof, can set the tone for the new executive’s tenure. What should they be doing? Pre-Onboarding Engagement: The process starts before the executive's first day. Boards must ensure clear communication about the company's vision, challenges, and expectations. This early dialogue helps align the executive’s mindset with the company's strategic goals. Structured Onboarding Plan: Developing a comprehensive, customised onboarding plan is crucial. This should cover not just the operational aspects of the role but also the cultural and interpersonal dynamics of the organisation. Mentorship and Networking Support: Assigning a mentor from the board or senior leadership can accelerate the integration process. Additionally, facilitating introductions and networking opportunities within and outside the company is invaluable. Regular Check-Ins and Feedback: Ongoing support doesn’t end after the first week or month. Regular check-ins to provide and receive feedback ensure any issues are addressed promptly. Performance Metrics: Clear, early-established metrics for success help the new executive understand how their performance will be measured. Enhancing Executive Performance through Effective Onboarding The correlation between effective onboarding and enhanced executive performance is well-established. A study by McKinsey found that executives who had a successful onboarding experience were 1.9 times more likely to exceed performance expectations. Furthermore, these executives reported feeling more integrated into the company culture and more effective in their roles earlier than their peers who experienced less structured onboarding. Effective onboarding leads to better decision-making, faster strategy implementation, and a more cohesive leadership team. It builds a foundation of trust and understanding that is crucial in the high-stake, rapidly evolving consumer goods market. Onboarding as a Strategic Imperative Effective executive onboarding goes beyond mere orientation – it is a strategic process that lays the groundwork for long-term success. As we've seen in the consumer goods industry in Australia, a well-planned and executed onboarding process can be the difference between a flourishing leadership tenure and a costly misstep. In an era where the cost of failure is high and the speed of change is relentless, consumer goods companies must view executive onboarding not as a perfunctory checklist but as a fundamental building block of sustainable leadership and organisational success. Remember, your new executive's journey is a reflection of your organisation's commitment to leadership excellence. Invest in their onboarding, and you're investing in the future of your company.
two men are sitting at a table with a laptop and talking to each other .
By John Elliott 18 Mar, 2024
Explore the pivotal choice between internal talent acquisition and hiring via executive search firms in the food and beverage industry for optimal growth.
Share by: