Why workplace mental health is directly linked to your bottom line.
Debbie Morrison • February 1, 2021

Why workplace mental health is directly linked to your bottom line.


Mental health challenges can be as devastating as they are intangible. Historically they’ve also been shrouded in stigma and misunderstanding. Thankfully, the past decade has seen a significant shift in attitudes towards the issue of mental health in all corners of Australian society, and workplaces are no exception.


Workplace mental health is a significant issue with far-reaching ramifications. Increasingly, leading employers understand that managing mental health extends far beyond their legal obligations under the Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth). Experience across many industries shows that when they get it right, the benefits can be very real both for their employees and the bottom line.


What is the cost of mental health?

As early as 2015 a report published by Safe Work Australia found the average annual direct cost to workers’ compensation schemes associated with mental disorder claims was $481 million. That’s a pretty staggering 11% of total scheme payouts – and you can be almost certain the mental health costs to the Australian economy are even higher now in 2020. The report also highlighted some other alarming figures surrounding the prevalence and cost of workplace mental health:


 

  • Each year approximately 7,820 Australians receive workers’ compensation as a result of a work-related mental condition
  • 6% of all workers’ compensation claims were for mental health disorders
  • 14.8 weeks was the typical time off work
  • 90% of claims were attributed to mental stress
  • 39% of mental disorder claims were attributed to harassment, bullying or exposure to violence in the workplace.

 


Another key insight for business owners and senior managers was that certain groups of employees were at much higher risk. Workers in the middle to latter stages of their careers (women aged between 35-59 and men aged between 35-64) were found to be significantly more likely to be affected by work-related mental health conditions than their younger colleagues.


Good mental health. Good for business.

Far beyond your legal obligations to provide a safe working environment for your employees, of which there are many, there are also compelling business reasons to take positive action on mental health. According to Headsup.org.au – a joint initiative between the Mentally Healthy Workplace Alliance and beyondblue – untreated mental health conditions cost Australian employers $10.9 billion every year through absenteeism, reduced productivity and compensation claims. The effects can also extend to poor morale, low staff engagement and high staff turnover rates.


But it isn’t all bad news, especially for progressive business leaders. Headsup.org.au also calculates that Australian businesses receive an average return of $2.30 for every $1 they invest in mental health initiatives. In other words, a 230% ROI!


How can you create a ‘mentally healthier’ workplace?

There are a vast number of strategies available to managers and employers ranging from peer support initiatives to education programs for both employees and managers to foster a greater sense of day-to-day mental awareness. An excellent place to start is the BeyondBlue Heads Up website which offers a range of resources available for support in the workplace, which you can visit here .


A woman is holding two bottles of cosmetics in her hands.
By John Elliott April 21, 2025
Australia’s health, wellness, and supplements sector isn’t just growing. It’s exploding. From functional drinks to adaptogenic gummies, wellness brands have gone from niche to mainstream in record time. The industry is now worth over $5.6 billion, up from $4.7 billion in 2020 — a 19% growth in just three years. IBISWorld projects continued expansion with a CAGR of 5.3% through 2028. But behind the glossy packaging and influencer campaigns, something else is happening: the regulators have arrived. And most wellness brands? They’re underprepared. From Trend to Target The boom brought founders, fitness coaches, nutritionists, and marketing entrepreneurs into the supplement space. What many built was impressive. But what most forgot was how fast wellness moves from enthusiasm to enforcement. With more than 40 infringement notices and administrative sanctions in Q1 alone, the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) strengthened enforcement of the Therapeutic Goods Advertising Code in early 2024. Prominent companies were named in public. Soon after, the ACCC revised its guidelines for influencer marketing disclosures and launched a campaign against the use of pseudoscientific terminology in product marketing. TGA head Professor Anthony Lawler noted in March 2024: “We’re seeing an unacceptably high level of non-compliance, particularly around unsubstantiated therapeutic claims.” In short: credibility is the new battleground. Why Sales-First Leadership is Failing Too many brands are still led by executives whose playbooks were built on community engagement, retail hustle, and Instagram fluency. That got them early traction. But it won’t keep them compliant — or protect them from an investor exodus when the lawsuits begin. The biggest risks now are not formulation errors. They’re: Claims breaches Compliance negligence Advertising missteps Unqualified health endorsements Reputational collapse through regulatory exposure And these aren’t theoretical. The TGA pulled 197 listed medicines from the market in 2023 alone — a 42% increase on the previous year — due to non-compliant claims or sponsor breaches. What the Next Wellness Leader Looks Like This is where many boards and founders face a difficult transition. The next generation of leadership in wellness isn’t defined by hustle. It’s defined by: Deep regulatory fluency Cross-functional commercial leadership (eComm, retail, pharma, FMCG) Reputation management under pressure Ability to scale with scrutiny, not just speed The leadership profiles now needed aren’t coming out of marketing agencies — they’re coming out of pharmaceuticals, healthtech, and functional food. They’ve sat on regulatory committees. They’ve built compliance-first commercial strategies. They understand how to win trust, not just impressions. Yes, this might feel like a shift away from the founder-led energy that made these brands exciting. But it’s not about slowing down. It’s about making sure you’re still standing when the music stops. Where the Gaps Are The underlying problem isn’t just non-compliance. It's immaturity in structural leadership. The majority of wellness brands haven't developed: An accountable governance structure; a scalable compliance architecture; a risk-aware marketing culture; and any significant succession planning beyond the founder. In fact, a 2023 survey by Complementary Medicines Australia found that only 22% of wellness businesses had dedicated compliance leadership at executive level, and just 14% had formal succession plans in place. This isn’t sustainable — not at scale, and certainly not under scrutiny. Final Thought The wellness boom isn’t over. But the rules have changed. Rapid growth is no longer enough. The brands that win from here will be those with: A compliance culture baked in Leadership teams built for complexity A board that sees regulation not as a barrier, but a brand advantage Those who don’t? They could be one audit away from crisis.
A Farmer walking through a barn, using a laptop with cows eating hay nearby.
By John Elliott April 17, 2025
Australia’s meat sector is facing a leadership vacuum. Explore the hidden crisis behind staffing, succession, and ESG risk in food manufacturing.