Why Does Retained Recruitment Win Every Time?
Debbie Morrison • July 24, 2024

Ever wonder why your recruitment process seems never-ending?

Are you constantly juggling resumes and interviews and still not finding the right fit?


Let’s break down the difference between contingency and retained recruitment and why retained recruitment is ultimately the wiser choice.

Quick vs. Quality: What’s Your Priority?


Contingency recruitment might seem appealing with its quick results and competitive edge, but are you sacrificing quality for speed?


You end up with a pool of candidates, but how many of them are truly the right fit?


Agencies working on a contingency basis often juggle multiple roles simultaneously, giving each one minimal attention just to get the job done.


This often results in a shallow candidate search and less dedication to finding the perfect match.


You’re relying on chance rather than a thorough, strategic search.


Contingency = by chance


Contingent recruitment typically yields a low 25% fill rate.


Recruiters pour 100% effort into securing fees but often work without guaranteed payment.


Focusing on quick placements can compromise candidate quality and lead to less productive outcomes.


Retained Recruitment: A Robust Approach


Retained recruitment is different.


It’s about taking the time to find quality candidates who fit your specific needs.


This method involves a robust methodology covering the entire market, ensuring that every potential candidate is considered.


Retained recruitment targets a broader and often more qualified pool by focusing on passive candidates interested in opportunities but not actively looking for them.


Did you know that 75% of candidates are not actively seeking roles?


Our approach is designed to engage this group by thinking ahead and understanding their motivations.


Our proactive, continuous mapping of the executive and senior talent pool, cultivation of relationships, and global networks offer unmatched access to leadership talent.


The Cost of a Bad Hire


Let’s face it: a bad hire can be a costly mistake.


Imagine hiring someone who looked great on paper but turned out to be a poor fit for your company.


The financial implications are significant, but the impact on team morale and productivity can be even more damaging.


A bad hire can set your company back in more ways than one.


Addressing Your Challenges


As a senior decision maker in leadership or HR, your main goals are to meet budget expectations, hire the right people, and ensure company growth.


But the challenges are real: tight budgets, short timelines, and finding candidates who fit your company’s culture and strategy.


ELR Executive's retained recruitment tackles these challenges directly.


Our approach ensures a quick, efficient hiring process.


We provide full transparency and regular updates, so you’ll never have to wonder about the status of your search.


Why Choose Retained Recruitment with ELR Executive?


The current market requires recruiters to conduct a thorough candidate search.


The best talent is harder to acquire than ever before, and they need more than a LinkedIn message to pique their interest in a new opportunity.


If the client is looking for the best candidate in the market at the time, they need to invest in a retained search.


At ELR Executive, we understand the importance of that.


Our retained recruitment service is designed to save you time and effort by conducting a comprehensive search tailored to your needs.


We leverage market mapping to identify the best talent, including those passive candidates who are not actively looking but are open to the right opportunity.


Our approach ensures that no stone is left unturned in the search for your perfect fit.


We discreetly deliver C-Suite, D-Suite, Executive, and Senior operational appointments across all departments and divisions essential to any business, ensuring our clients get the management expertise they need to achieve the growth they want.


Isn’t it time you had a recruitment process that worked for you, not against you?


Let’s discuss how ELR Executives’s retained recruitment can help you achieve your goals and streamline your hiring process.

A group of business people are walking in front of a city skyline.
By John Elliott July 18, 2025
Australia’s FMCG sector is confronting a leadership crisis. CEO turnover is accelerating, succession pipelines are underdeveloped.
By John Elliott June 26, 2025
You don’t hear about it on the nightly news. There’s no breaking story. No panic. No protests. Just rows of vegetables being pulled out of the ground with no plan to replant. Just farmers who no longer believe there’s a future for them here. Just quiet decisions — to sell, to walk away, to stop. And if you ask around the industry, they’ll tell you the same thing: It’s not just one bad season. It’s a slow death by a thousand margins. 1 in 3 growers are preparing to leaveIn September 2024, AUSVEG released a national sentiment report with a statistic that should have set off alarms in every capital city: 34% of Australian vegetable growers were considering exiting the industry in the next 12 months. Another one-third said they’d leave if offered a fair price for their farm. Source: AUSVEG Industry Sentiment Report 2024 (PDF) These aren’t abstract hypotheticals. These are real decisions, already in motion. For many, it’s not about profitability anymore, it’s about survival. This isn’t burnout. It’s entrapment. Behind the numbers are people whose entire identity is tied to a profession that no longer feeds them. Many are asset-rich but cash-poor. They own the land. But the land owns them back. Selling means walking away from decades of history. Staying means bleeding capital, month by month, in a system where working harder delivers less. Every year, input costs rise, fuel, fertiliser, compliance. But the farmgate price doesn’t move. Or worse, it drops. Retail World Magazine reports that even though national vegetable production increased 3% in 2023–24, the total farmgate value fell by $140 million. Growers produced more and earned less. That’s not a market. That’s a trap. What no one wants to say aloud The truth is this: many growers are only staying because they can’t leave. If you’re deep in debt, if your farm is tied to multi-generational ownership, if you’ve invested everything in equipment, infrastructure, or land access, walking away isn’t easy. It’s a last resort. So instead, you stay. You cut your hours. Delay maintenance. Avoid upgrades. Cancel the next round of planting. You wait for something to shift, interest rates, weather, prices and you pretend that waiting is strategy. According to the latest fruitnet.com survey, over 50% of vegetable growers say they’re financially worse off than a year ago. And nearly 40% expect conditions to deteriorate further. This isn’t about optimism or resilience. It’s about dignity and the quiet erosion of it. Supermarkets won’t save them, and they never planned to In the current model, supermarket pricing doesn’t reflect real-world farm economics. Retailers demand year-round consistency, aesthetic perfection, and lower prices. They don’t absorb rising input costs, they externalise them. They offer promotions funded not by their marketing budgets, but by the growers’ margins. Farmers take the risk. Retailers take the profit. And because the power imbalance is so deeply entrenched, there’s no real negotiation, just quiet coercion dressed up as "category planning." Let’s talk about what’s actually broken This isn’t just a market failure. It’s a policy failure. Australia’s horticulture system has been built on: Decades of deregulated wholesale markets Lack of collective bargaining power for growers Retailer consolidation that has created a virtual duopoly Export-focused incentives that bypass smaller domestic producers There’s no meaningful floor price for key produce lines. No national enforcement of fair dealing. No public database that links supermarket shelf price to farmgate return. Which means growers, like James, can be driven into loss-making supply contracts without ever seeing the true economics of their product downstream. But the real silence? It’s from consumers. Here’s what no one wants to admit: We say we care about “buying local.” We say we value the farmer’s role. We share those viral posts about strawberries going unsold or milk prices being unfair. And then we complain about a $4 lettuce. We opt for the cheapest bag of carrots. We walk past the "imperfect" produce bin. We frown at the cost of organic and click “Add to Cart” on whatever’s half price. We’re not just bystanders. We’re part of the equation. What happens when the growers go? At first, very little. Supermarkets will find substitutes. Importers will fill gaps. Large agribusinesses will expand into spaces vacated by smaller players. Prices will stay low, until they don’t. But over time, we’ll notice: Produce that travels further and lasts less. Fewer independent growers at farmer’s markets. Entire regions losing their growing identity. National food security becoming a campaign promise instead of a reality. And when the climate throws something serious at us, drought, flood, global supply shock, we’ll realise how little resilience we’ve preserved. So what do we do? We start by telling the truth. Australia is not food secure. Not if 1 in 3 growers are planning to exit. The market isn’t working. Not when prices rise at the shelf and fall at the farmgate. The solution isn’t scale. It’s fairness, visibility, and rebalancing power. That means: Mandating cost-reflective contracts between retailers and suppliers Enabling collective bargaining rights for growers Building transparent data systems linking production costs to consumer prices Introducing transition finance for smaller producers navigating reform and climate pressure And holding supermarkets publicly accountable for margin extraction But more than anything, it means recognising what we’re losing, before it's gone. Final word If you ate a vegetable today, it likely came from someone who’s considered giving up in the past year. Not because they don’t care. But because caring doesn’t pay. This isn’t about nostalgia. It’s about sovereignty, over what we eat, how we grow it, and who gets to stay in the system.  Because the next time you see rows of green stretching to the horizon, you might want to ask: How many of these fields are already planning their last harvest?