Best Behaviour
Debbie Morrison • July 13, 2021

Best Behaviour


“Using smart behavioural interview questions to gain candidate insights”


When you’re assessing candidates for a given position, a resume and cover letter will tell you some things about them, but an interview is the pudding where the proof is to be found. The questions you (or a recruiter, on your behalf) ask in the course of an interview take several forms. There are, of course, basic questions that arise in almost every interview. Some relating to the work history of a candidate – why they took and left various jobs; their goals and objectives, strengths and weaknesses, salary expectations. Behavioural interview questions complement those with deeper insight into the tendencies and preferences of your candidate.


Behavioural, or situational, interview questions ask a candidate to talk about a real-world example when they experienced a particular thing, or took a certain action. So why do we ask them? Simply put: past performance is the best indicator of future performance. What a person has done in the past, the way they’ve responded to various situations, is probably pretty similar to what they’ll do if they end up working for you.


If you plan to include questions like these in your interviews, first you’ll need to determine what questions will produce the most useful insights. To help, here are two questions to ask yourself:


What are the skills, attributes and characteristics that a person will need to be most successful in the position?


What are some situations that someone in this position will frequently have to deal with, or problems that they’ll often need to solve?


For the first question, let’s say you’ve determined that a successful employee needs to be highly detail-oriented, with well-developed analytical skills, and able to work well under pressure. It’s easy to write those words on a resume (and they appear on almost every one), but a great candidate should be able to provide evidence. So you might ask:


“Tell me about a time when you caught an error that others had missed.”


“Tell me about the most complex or difficult information you’ve ever had to analyse.”


“Give me an example of a time you had to juggle an unusually large number of projects and priorities.”


For the second question, imagine that the position involves negotiation of contracts, and some formal presentations. Let’s take a different approach with these examples. Questions that ask a candidate to talk about failure are particularly useful, because they not only give you information about what they’ve done in the past, they also provide signals about how well the person learns from their mistakes. So you might ask:


“Give me an example of a time you were unhappy with the results of a negotiation you were involved in.”


“Give me an example of a time when a presentation you were making wasn’t working and you switched tactics to attempt to turn it around.”


When answering these questions, candidates will often use what’s known as the ‘STAR’ format. ‘S’ stands for ‘Situation’ (what was happening that led to the events they’re about to describe?). ‘T’ stands for ‘Tactic’, or ‘Target’ (what was the plan, and what did they hope to achieve?). ‘A’ stands for ‘Action’ (what would you have seen them do, or known they had done, if you’d been there?). And ‘R’ stands for ‘Result’ (good or bad, what was the outcome?). If the situation was one that evolved and was dealt with relatively quickly or simply, with less planning and deliberation required, ‘CAR’ is fine: Context, Action, Result. Listen for all these elements, and don’t be afraid to ask follow-up or probing questions if you’re not hearing enough detail. Here are a few of my favourites:


“What other options did you consider?”


“How did you feel when that happened?”


“What do you wish you had done differently?”


“What did you learn from the situation that you’ve since used?”


Interviews are, by their very nature, ‘artificial’ environments where everyone is playing a role and putting their best foot forward. Behavioural questions offer a peek into the real-world thoughts and actions of a candidate, and can be a huge help in selecting the one that can offer the on-the-job performance you need. Choose wisely, and ask away.


Want to know more? Get in touch and let’s talk.


A woman is holding two bottles of cosmetics in her hands.
By John Elliott April 21, 2025
Australia’s health, wellness, and supplements sector isn’t just growing. It’s exploding. From functional drinks to adaptogenic gummies, wellness brands have gone from niche to mainstream in record time. The industry is now worth over $5.6 billion, up from $4.7 billion in 2020 — a 19% growth in just three years. IBISWorld projects continued expansion with a CAGR of 5.3% through 2028. But behind the glossy packaging and influencer campaigns, something else is happening: the regulators have arrived. And most wellness brands? They’re underprepared. From Trend to Target The boom brought founders, fitness coaches, nutritionists, and marketing entrepreneurs into the supplement space. What many built was impressive. But what most forgot was how fast wellness moves from enthusiasm to enforcement. With more than 40 infringement notices and administrative sanctions in Q1 alone, the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) strengthened enforcement of the Therapeutic Goods Advertising Code in early 2024. Prominent companies were named in public. Soon after, the ACCC revised its guidelines for influencer marketing disclosures and launched a campaign against the use of pseudoscientific terminology in product marketing. TGA head Professor Anthony Lawler noted in March 2024: “We’re seeing an unacceptably high level of non-compliance, particularly around unsubstantiated therapeutic claims.” In short: credibility is the new battleground. Why Sales-First Leadership is Failing Too many brands are still led by executives whose playbooks were built on community engagement, retail hustle, and Instagram fluency. That got them early traction. But it won’t keep them compliant — or protect them from an investor exodus when the lawsuits begin. The biggest risks now are not formulation errors. They’re: Claims breaches Compliance negligence Advertising missteps Unqualified health endorsements Reputational collapse through regulatory exposure And these aren’t theoretical. The TGA pulled 197 listed medicines from the market in 2023 alone — a 42% increase on the previous year — due to non-compliant claims or sponsor breaches. What the Next Wellness Leader Looks Like This is where many boards and founders face a difficult transition. The next generation of leadership in wellness isn’t defined by hustle. It’s defined by: Deep regulatory fluency Cross-functional commercial leadership (eComm, retail, pharma, FMCG) Reputation management under pressure Ability to scale with scrutiny, not just speed The leadership profiles now needed aren’t coming out of marketing agencies — they’re coming out of pharmaceuticals, healthtech, and functional food. They’ve sat on regulatory committees. They’ve built compliance-first commercial strategies. They understand how to win trust, not just impressions. Yes, this might feel like a shift away from the founder-led energy that made these brands exciting. But it’s not about slowing down. It’s about making sure you’re still standing when the music stops. Where the Gaps Are The underlying problem isn’t just non-compliance. It's immaturity in structural leadership. The majority of wellness brands haven't developed: An accountable governance structure; a scalable compliance architecture; a risk-aware marketing culture; and any significant succession planning beyond the founder. In fact, a 2023 survey by Complementary Medicines Australia found that only 22% of wellness businesses had dedicated compliance leadership at executive level, and just 14% had formal succession plans in place. This isn’t sustainable — not at scale, and certainly not under scrutiny. Final Thought The wellness boom isn’t over. But the rules have changed. Rapid growth is no longer enough. The brands that win from here will be those with: A compliance culture baked in Leadership teams built for complexity A board that sees regulation not as a barrier, but a brand advantage Those who don’t? They could be one audit away from crisis.
A Farmer walking through a barn, using a laptop with cows eating hay nearby.
By John Elliott April 17, 2025
Australia’s meat sector is facing a leadership vacuum. Explore the hidden crisis behind staffing, succession, and ESG risk in food manufacturing.